Last night (2014 Aug. 06.10903) I detected CSS 130418:174033+414756 (aka ASASSN-13ae), classified as type UGWZ in VSX, in outburst at magnitude 13.8 (visual). I would appreciate confirming observations from other observers!
Perhaps this object is misclassified? A previous outburst occurred just 15 months ago:
http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=4999
Thanks,
Carey (CCY)
With a quiescence of around 20 this looks like a certain UGWZ. Maybe it's a very active one! This would be the one with the shortest outburst interval! Or maybe it's a extreme UGSU?
Hope to catch it with the BRT.
Regards,
Eddy
I don't see too much evidence for type UGWZ in this system. Where has this come from? Kato?
Will check it out tonight if it's clear!
Gary
One hour ago I took some CCD V images of ASASSN-13ae. It's bright. My measurement (already in AAVSO Database) = 13.9755V.
Regards,
Juan-Luis
Thanks for the heads-up! Definitely see it on my CCD images taken near 0830UT on 07Aug14.
James
Thank you, Juan-Luis and James, for your confirming observations.
I was able to see the star again last night, but it was near my limit, and I will probably not be able to see it again due to the bright moonlight.
-Carey (CCY)
Here's what I got:
Object
Mag
Err
Band
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456876.85753
13.980
0.061
V
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456876.86053
13.991
0.073
V
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456877.79858
14.050
0.059
V
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456877.80148
14.020
0.064
V
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456876.85116
13.908
0.063
B
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456876.85404
13.880
0.058
B
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456877.79207
14.023
0.050
B
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456877.79522
13.956
0.055
B
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456876.86390
13.897
0.071
R
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456876.86684
13.943
0.070
R
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456877.80483
13.931
0.062
R
CSS 130418:174033+414756
2456877.80782
13.971
0.070
R
Unfortunately, my ST-10XME is in for repairs so I had to use the "pretty picture" antiblooming CCD (SBIG STL-11K) with old Schuler 48mm photometric glass filters. Hope these ensemble, un-transformed BVR magnitudes are close to what other folks have gotten.
James