We are excited to announce the launch of our new forums! You can access it forums.aavso.org. For questions, please see our blog post. The forums at aavso.org/forum have become read-only.
Announcement: New Applications
We are excited to announce the launch of our new applications! We're opening up early access to our new applications for searching, downloading, and submitting photometric observations. You can now access these applications through these links:
We ask for your feedback in order to help us improve these applications. Please send feedback for the applications above to feedback@aavso.org. Note: please avoid duplicating submissions across the two submit applications.
American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
Sat, 11/07/2015 - 17:10
In the AAVSO comp star sequences the sources listed sometimes include "K35". What is K35 and how reliable are these magnitudes? Is there a general description of all these photometry sources used for making AAVSO sequences?
K35 was "Kracji 35", a C14 OTA on Tom's homebrew fork mount at Astrokolkhoz Observatory in New Mexico. It was part of AAVSOnet until October 2012. I did quite a bit of calibration work with that telescope, which is where the photometry comes from. The photometry is as accurate as the uncertainties attached to each magnitude/color.
There is no general description of the various calibration sources other than their names. It would be a good idea to document them all; thanks for the suggestion!
Hi Phil,
K35 was "Kracji 35", a C14 OTA on Tom's homebrew fork mount at Astrokolkhoz Observatory in New Mexico. It was part of AAVSOnet until October 2012. I did quite a bit of calibration work with that telescope, which is where the photometry comes from. The photometry is as accurate as the uncertainties attached to each magnitude/color.
There is no general description of the various calibration sources other than their names. It would be a good idea to document them all; thanks for the suggestion!
Arne