C9.25 OTA and current mount or C9.25 NexStar Evolution + equatorial wedge?
Announcement: New Forums
We are excited to announce the launch of our new forums! You can access it forums.aavso.org. For questions, please see our blog post. The forums at aavso.org/forum have become read-only.
Announcement: New Applications
We are excited to announce the launch of our new applications! We're opening up early access to our new applications for searching, downloading, and submitting photometric observations. You can now access these applications through these links:
We ask for your feedback in order to help us improve these applications. Please send feedback for the applications above to feedback@aavso.org. Note: please avoid duplicating submissions across the two submit applications.
American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
Fri, 09/18/2020 - 07:07
Would you recommend a Celestron C9.25 OTA with a SkyWatcher EQ6-R Pro mount or the same size OTA on an Nexstar Evolution alt-az mount on an equatorial wedge?
I would opt for the C9.25 OTA and the Skywatcher EQ6-R Pro. With this combo you can change the OTA to another one in case of need. In the past I had a 8inch OTA on a EQ6 mount and could do phototmetry without autoguiding at f/8.
Celestron Evolution is a single fork ALT-AZ and C9.25 is a large OTA. If it has to be ALT/AZ I'd opt for double fork options (which I'm also considering for my C9.25)
I heard that the EQ6-R would have to be tweeked a bit to get it to handle a C9.25 and I don't want to buy another mount for it. So I opted for a classic C8 for photometry that I purchased for $300. My mount can handle it since it weighs less than my current scope. The primary mirror for the C8 is 33% wider and with almost double the focal length after adding a f/6.3 focal reducer so I won't have to worry about undersampling with my ST8XE.
Maybe in the future, when I can afford it, I might upgrade to both a bigger scope and mirror. Perhaps when I get a permament pier, equatorial wedge, and observatory, I'll buy the fork mounted 11" and skip the C9.25".
Hi,
I would opt for the C9.25 OTA and the Skywatcher EQ6-R Pro. With this combo you can change the OTA to another one in case of need. In the past I had a 8inch OTA on a EQ6 mount and could do phototmetry without autoguiding at f/8.
Josch
I already have an EQ6-R. I was thinking of getting the second mount to
Celestron Evolution is a single fork ALT-AZ and C9.25 is a large OTA. If it has to be ALT/AZ I'd opt for double fork options (which I'm also considering for my C9.25)
I heard that the EQ6-R would have to be tweeked a bit to get it to handle a C9.25 and I don't want to buy another mount for it. So I opted for a classic C8 for photometry that I purchased for $300. My mount can handle it since it weighs less than my current scope. The primary mirror for the C8 is 33% wider and with almost double the focal length after adding a f/6.3 focal reducer so I won't have to worry about undersampling with my ST8XE.
Maybe in the future, when I can afford it, I might upgrade to both a bigger scope and mirror. Perhaps when I get a permament pier, equatorial wedge, and observatory, I'll buy the fork mounted 11" and skip the C9.25".